Development #4863
http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments canonicalization support
100%
Description
I have an IDP that is submitting SAML Responses to an SP built with Lasso (mod_auth_melon). This IDP uses the http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments canonicalization format which doesn't seem to be specified anywhere in your code base. This causes validation errors.
If http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments is supported can you tell me how to utilize it? If not, can you consider adding support for it?
Révisions associées
Historique
Mis à jour par Benjamin Dauvergne il y a plus de 8 ans
Is it still useful for you ? Which implementation is requiring that canonicalization method ?
Mis à jour par Benjamin Dauvergne il y a environ 8 ans
- Assigné à mis à Benjamin Dauvergne
- Version cible changé de future à 318
- Patch proposed mis à Non
Mis à jour par Dustin Minnich il y a environ 8 ans
Benjamin Dauvergne a écrit :
Is it still useful for you ? Which implementation is requiring that canonicalization method ?
We worked around this in our IDP some time ago.
If you think others would find it useful feel free to add the feature whenever you get around to it. Otherwise, feel free to close the ticket.
Mis à jour par Benjamin Dauvergne il y a environ 8 ans
- Statut changé de Nouveau à Résolu (à déployer)
- % réalisé changé de 0 à 100
Appliqué par commit 1194b3e670c2927ce43aaff9eccd110d9642d5ba.
Mis à jour par Benjamin Dauvergne il y a environ 8 ans
Dustin Minnich a écrit :
Benjamin Dauvergne a écrit :
Is it still useful for you ? Which implementation is requiring that canonicalization method ?
We worked around this in our IDP some time ago.
If you think others would find it useful feel free to add the feature whenever you get around to it. Otherwise, feel free to close the ticket.
The specification mandate support for http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments so I added it, I also added new ones from the C14N 1.1 standard.
Mis à jour par Dustin Minnich il y a environ 8 ans
Benjamin Dauvergne a écrit :
Dustin Minnich a écrit :
Benjamin Dauvergne a écrit :
Is it still useful for you ? Which implementation is requiring that canonicalization method ?
We worked around this in our IDP some time ago.
If you think others would find it useful feel free to add the feature whenever you get around to it. Otherwise, feel free to close the ticket.
The specification mandate support for http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments so I added it, I also added new ones from the C14N 1.1 standard.
Awesome! Thanks for the work.
Mis à jour par Benjamin Dauvergne il y a presque 6 ans
- Statut changé de Résolu (à déployer) à Fermé
add support for C14N 1.1 methods and C14N withComments methods (fixes #4863)