Development #4863
http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments canonicalization support
100%
Description
I have an IDP that is submitting SAML Responses to an SP built with Lasso (mod_auth_melon). This IDP uses the http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments canonicalization format which doesn't seem to be specified anywhere in your code base. This causes validation errors.
If http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments is supported can you tell me how to utilize it? If not, can you consider adding support for it?
Associated revisions
History
Updated by Benjamin Dauvergne about 9 years ago
Is it still useful for you ? Which implementation is requiring that canonicalization method ?
Updated by Benjamin Dauvergne over 8 years ago
- Assignee set to Benjamin Dauvergne
- Target version changed from future to 318
- Patch proposed set to No
Updated by Dustin Minnich over 8 years ago
Benjamin Dauvergne a écrit :
Is it still useful for you ? Which implementation is requiring that canonicalization method ?
We worked around this in our IDP some time ago.
If you think others would find it useful feel free to add the feature whenever you get around to it. Otherwise, feel free to close the ticket.
Updated by Benjamin Dauvergne over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Nouveau to Résolu (à déployer)
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Appliqué par commit 1194b3e670c2927ce43aaff9eccd110d9642d5ba.
Updated by Benjamin Dauvergne over 8 years ago
Dustin Minnich a écrit :
Benjamin Dauvergne a écrit :
Is it still useful for you ? Which implementation is requiring that canonicalization method ?
We worked around this in our IDP some time ago.
If you think others would find it useful feel free to add the feature whenever you get around to it. Otherwise, feel free to close the ticket.
The specification mandate support for http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments so I added it, I also added new ones from the C14N 1.1 standard.
Updated by Dustin Minnich over 8 years ago
Benjamin Dauvergne a écrit :
Dustin Minnich a écrit :
Benjamin Dauvergne a écrit :
Is it still useful for you ? Which implementation is requiring that canonicalization method ?
We worked around this in our IDP some time ago.
If you think others would find it useful feel free to add the feature whenever you get around to it. Otherwise, feel free to close the ticket.
The specification mandate support for http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments so I added it, I also added new ones from the C14N 1.1 standard.
Awesome! Thanks for the work.
add support for C14N 1.1 methods and C14N withComments methods (fixes #4863)